SOP Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA)

​

Summary

Your Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) SOP establishes a systematic process for identifying, investigating, and resolving actual or potential nonconformities to eliminate root causes and prevent recurrence while ensuring proportionate responses that maintain device safety and regulatory compliance.

​

Why is SOP CAPA important?

CAPA exists because regulators require systematic problem-solving rather than reactive fixes that only address symptoms. It transforms quality issues from isolated incidents into opportunities for systematic improvement by addressing root causes and preventing similar problems across your entire quality system.

The SOP ensures consistency in how you evaluate events, conduct investigations, and implement solutions. It also provides auditors with evidence that your organization learns from mistakes and proactively prevents issues. Most importantly, it demonstrates that your quality system is continuously improving rather than just maintaining compliance, which builds regulatory confidence and customer trust.

​

Regulatory Context

​

Guide

Your CAPA SOP establishes the framework for systematic problem resolution. Design the process to focus on root cause elimination rather than quick fixes that only address symptoms.

​

CAPA Qualification and Initiation

Implement a risk-based qualification process to determine when CAPAs are necessary. Not every issue requires a full CAPA - use systematic criteria considering factors like patient safety impact, systemic nature, trend analysis, and severity. Establish clear thresholds that trigger CAPA initiation while avoiding overwhelming your team with low-impact events.

Create qualification criteria that include input type scoring (patient safety issues receive highest priority), systemic impact assessment, trend analysis results, and potential for patient harm. Document the rationale for CAPA decisions to demonstrate consistent application of your criteria during audits.

​

Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

Conduct thorough investigations using structured methodologies like the Five Whys or fishbone diagrams. Involve subject matter experts from affected areas rather than limiting investigation to quality personnel alone. The goal is identifying systemic root causes rather than individual blame or surface-level symptoms.

Document investigation findings comprehensively, including timeline reconstruction, contributing factors, and multiple potential root causes. Use evidence-based analysis rather than assumptions, and validate findings through data review and stakeholder interviews.

​

Action Planning and Implementation

Develop action plans that address identified root causes proportionately. Consider immediate containment actions for urgent issues, corrective actions to fix existing problems, and preventive actions to avoid similar future issues. Ensure actions don’t create unintended consequences or compromise device safety.

Assign clear responsibilities, realistic timelines, and measurable success criteria for each action. Include resource requirements and management approval for significant changes. Integrate action implementation with existing change control processes to maintain system integrity.

​

Effectiveness Verification

Establish verification methods before implementing actions. Define specific metrics and timeframes for measuring CAPA effectiveness. This might include monitoring complaint trends, audit findings, process performance indicators, or customer satisfaction metrics.

Conduct effectiveness reviews at predetermined intervals rather than assuming actions worked. Document verification results and close CAPAs only when effectiveness is demonstrated. If actions prove ineffective, initiate new CAPAs rather than extending existing ones indefinitely.

​

Integration with Quality System

Connect your CAPA system to all quality processes including audit programs, management review, post-market surveillance, and design controls. CAPA outcomes should inform risk management updates, training needs assessments, and quality objective setting.

Maintain CAPA trending analysis to identify systemic issues requiring management attention. Use CAPA data during management review to demonstrate quality system effectiveness and guide strategic quality decisions.

​

Example

​

Scenario

MedTech Solutions receives multiple customer complaints about their diabetes monitoring app crashing during glucose readings. The quality team uses their CAPA qualification process to assess the issue, conducts a root cause investigation involving the software development team, and implements systematic corrections to prevent similar software failures.

​

CAPA Process Implementation

Event: Three customer complaints received within two weeks about app crashes during critical glucose readings, with one report of delayed insulin administration.

CAPA Qualification:

• Input Type: Customer complaints (+2) with patient safety implications (+3)
• Systemic: Multiple similar complaints indicate systemic issue (+2)
• Trend Analysis: Pattern identified through complaint monitoring (+2)
• Significant Impact: App crashes during critical medical function (+2)
• Patient Harm: Potential delayed treatment (+1)
• Total Score: 12 (exceeds threshold of 3)
• Decision: Initiate CAPA

Investigation and Root Cause Analysis: Quality team collaborates with software development team using Five Whys methodology:

• Problem: App crashes during glucose reading function
• Why #1: Memory overflow in glucose calculation module
• Why #2: Inadequate memory allocation for complex calculations
• Why #3: Algorithm optimization not performed during recent feature updates
• Why #4: Testing protocols don’t include memory stress testing
• Why #5: Software validation procedures lack comprehensive performance testing requirements
• Root Cause: Insufficient software validation procedures for performance under stress conditions

Action Plan:

1. Immediate Containment: Release hotfix within 48 hours to optimize memory usage
2. Corrective Action: Update software validation SOP to include performance stress testing
3. Preventive Action: Implement automated memory monitoring in development environment
4. System Updates: Revise design control procedures to require performance validation

Implementation and Verification:

• Hotfix deployed successfully with zero crashes reported in two-week monitoring period
• Updated SOPs reviewed and approved by management representative
• Development team trained on new testing requirements
• Automated monitoring tools integrated into continuous integration pipeline
• Effectiveness Verification: No similar crashes reported in 90-day monitoring period
• CAPA Status: Closed after effectiveness confirmation

​

Q&A