Skip to main content

​
Summary

Your Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA) SOP establishes a systematic process for identifying, investigating, and resolving actual or potential nonconformities to eliminate root causes and prevent recurrence while ensuring proportionate responses that maintain device safety and regulatory compliance.

​
Why is SOP CAPA important?

CAPA exists because regulators require systematic problem-solving rather than reactive fixes that only address symptoms. It transforms quality issues from isolated incidents into opportunities for systematic improvement by addressing root causes and preventing similar problems across your entire quality system. The SOP ensures consistency in how you evaluate events, conduct investigations, and implement solutions. It also provides auditors with evidence that your organization learns from mistakes and proactively prevents issues. Most importantly, it demonstrates that your quality system is continuously improving rather than just maintaining compliance, which builds regulatory confidence and customer trust.

​
Regulatory Context

  • FDA
  • MDR
Under 21 CFR Part 820 (Quality System Regulation):
  • CAPA system is mandatory under Section 820.100
  • Must address all actual nonconformities and potential problems
  • Requires systematic investigation and root cause analysis
  • Actions must be proportionate to the magnitude of problems
  • Must verify implementation and effectiveness of corrective actions
Special attention required for:
  • Medical Device Reporting (MDR) integration (21 CFR Part 803)
  • Field corrective actions that may require FDA notification
  • CAPA trending analysis and management review integration
  • Documentation requirements for FDA inspections and 483 observations

​
Guide

Your CAPA SOP establishes the framework for systematic problem resolution. Design the process to focus on root cause elimination rather than quick fixes that only address symptoms.

​
CAPA Qualification and Initiation

Implement a risk-based qualification process to determine when CAPAs are necessary. Not every issue requires a full CAPA - use systematic criteria considering factors like patient safety impact, systemic nature, trend analysis, and severity. Establish clear thresholds that trigger CAPA initiation while avoiding overwhelming your team with low-impact events. Create qualification criteria that include input type scoring (patient safety issues receive highest priority), systemic impact assessment, trend analysis results, and potential for patient harm. Document the rationale for CAPA decisions to demonstrate consistent application of your criteria during audits.

​
Investigation and Root Cause Analysis

Conduct thorough investigations using structured methodologies like the Five Whys or fishbone diagrams. Involve subject matter experts from affected areas rather than limiting investigation to quality personnel alone. The goal is identifying systemic root causes rather than individual blame or surface-level symptoms. Document investigation findings comprehensively, including timeline reconstruction, contributing factors, and multiple potential root causes. Use evidence-based analysis rather than assumptions, and validate findings through data review and stakeholder interviews.

​
Action Planning and Implementation

Develop action plans that address identified root causes proportionately. Consider immediate containment actions for urgent issues, corrective actions to fix existing problems, and preventive actions to avoid similar future issues. Ensure actions don’t create unintended consequences or compromise device safety. Assign clear responsibilities, realistic timelines, and measurable success criteria for each action. Include resource requirements and management approval for significant changes. Integrate action implementation with existing change control processes to maintain system integrity.

​
Effectiveness Verification

Establish verification methods before implementing actions. Define specific metrics and timeframes for measuring CAPA effectiveness. This might include monitoring complaint trends, audit findings, process performance indicators, or customer satisfaction metrics. Conduct effectiveness reviews at predetermined intervals rather than assuming actions worked. Document verification results and close CAPAs only when effectiveness is demonstrated. If actions prove ineffective, initiate new CAPAs rather than extending existing ones indefinitely.

​
Integration with Quality System

Connect your CAPA system to all quality processes including audit programs, management review, post-market surveillance, and design controls. CAPA outcomes should inform risk management updates, training needs assessments, and quality objective setting. Maintain CAPA trending analysis to identify systemic issues requiring management attention. Use CAPA data during management review to demonstrate quality system effectiveness and guide strategic quality decisions.

​
Example

​
Scenario

MedTech Solutions receives multiple customer complaints about their diabetes monitoring app crashing during glucose readings. The quality team uses their CAPA qualification process to assess the issue, conducts a root cause investigation involving the software development team, and implements systematic corrections to prevent similar software failures.

​
CAPA Process Implementation

Event: Three customer complaints received within two weeks about app crashes during critical glucose readings, with one report of delayed insulin administration. CAPA Qualification:
  • Input Type: Customer complaints (+2) with patient safety implications (+3)
  • Systemic: Multiple similar complaints indicate systemic issue (+2)
  • Trend Analysis: Pattern identified through complaint monitoring (+2)
  • Significant Impact: App crashes during critical medical function (+2)
  • Patient Harm: Potential delayed treatment (+1)
  • Total Score: 12 (exceeds threshold of 3)
  • Decision: Initiate CAPA
Investigation and Root Cause Analysis: Quality team collaborates with software development team using Five Whys methodology:
  • Problem: App crashes during glucose reading function
  • Why #1: Memory overflow in glucose calculation module
  • Why #2: Inadequate memory allocation for complex calculations
  • Why #3: Algorithm optimization not performed during recent feature updates
  • Why #4: Testing protocols don’t include memory stress testing
  • Why #5: Software validation procedures lack comprehensive performance testing requirements
  • Root Cause: Insufficient software validation procedures for performance under stress conditions
Action Plan:
  1. Immediate Containment: Release hotfix within 48 hours to optimize memory usage
  2. Corrective Action: Update software validation SOP to include performance stress testing
  3. Preventive Action: Implement automated memory monitoring in development environment
  4. System Updates: Revise design control procedures to require performance validation
Implementation and Verification:
  • Hotfix deployed successfully with zero crashes reported in two-week monitoring period
  • Updated SOPs reviewed and approved by management representative
  • Development team trained on new testing requirements
  • Automated monitoring tools integrated into continuous integration pipeline
  • Effectiveness Verification: No similar crashes reported in 90-day monitoring period
  • CAPA Status: Closed after effectiveness confirmation

​
Q&A

Use your risk-based qualification process to evaluate each event systematically. Consider factors like patient safety impact, whether the issue is systemic, if it’s part of a trend, and the potential for harm. Score these factors according to your established criteria and initiate CAPA when thresholds are exceeded. Document your decision rationale for audit purposes.
Corrective actions fix existing problems to prevent recurrence, while preventive actions address potential problems before they occur. In practice, most CAPAs include both elements - correcting the immediate issue and preventing similar problems across your quality system. Focus on root cause elimination for lasting effectiveness.
Log complaints related to device performance or safety in your complaint management system and evaluate each for CAPA qualification. Significant complaints indicating systemic issues or safety concerns should trigger CAPA initiation. Compile complaint data for trend analysis and include findings in your post-market surveillance reporting.
CAPAs should remain open until effectiveness is verified through your predetermined metrics and timeframes. Avoid arbitrary closure timelines - instead focus on completing investigation, implementing actions, and demonstrating effectiveness. If actions prove ineffective, initiate new CAPAs rather than extending existing ones indefinitely.
Include quality team members for oversight and subject matter experts from affected areas for technical expertise. For software issues, involve development teams; for manufacturing problems, include production personnel. The key is combining quality system knowledge with domain expertise for thorough investigation and effective solutions.
Unofficial audit recommendations should be reviewed and considered for implementation but don’t automatically require CAPA initiation. They can be managed through change management by updating documents to improve compliance. Evaluate each recommendation using your CAPA qualification criteria to determine if formal CAPA is warranted.
⌘I