Management Review Report

​

Summary

A Management Review Report documents the periodic evaluation of your Quality Management System (QMS) by top management. It provides a systematic assessment of QMS performance through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), audit results, customer feedback, and process effectiveness. The report demonstrates management commitment to quality and drives strategic decisions for continuous improvement of your medical device quality system.

​

Why is a Management Review Report important?

The Management Review Report exists because regulatory frameworks require top management to take active responsibility for quality management system effectiveness. It’s not sufficient for management to simply approve procedures - they must regularly evaluate whether the entire quality system is working and achieving its intended outcomes.

For medical device manufacturers, the Management Review Report is crucial because it demonstrates executive oversight to regulatory authorities and notified bodies. It shows that quality decisions are made at the highest organizational level with full awareness of system performance. The report drives strategic quality planning by identifying trends, resource needs, and improvement opportunities that require management attention. Without systematic management review, you risk quality system drift, missed improvement opportunities, and regulatory findings related to inadequate management responsibility for quality.

​

Regulatory Context

​

Guide

Your Management Review Report must systematically evaluate QMS performance and drive strategic quality decisions. The report transforms operational data into management insights that guide resource allocation and improvement priorities.

​

1. Overall QMS Assessment

The management review assessment provides your executive summary of quality system performance. This section requires you to synthesize information from multiple sources - audit results, KPI performance, customer feedback, and process metrics - into a clear management perspective on QMS effectiveness.

You must address whether your quality system is suitable (appropriate for your organization and products), adequate (sufficient to meet regulatory requirements), and effective (achieving intended quality outcomes). If performance meets expectations, state this clearly with supporting evidence. If improvements are needed, identify specific areas requiring management attention and resource allocation.

​

2. Key Performance Indicator Review

The KPI assessment table provides the detailed data that supports your overall QMS assessment. For each quality process, you must evaluate actual performance against established acceptance criteria and provide a management assessment of results.

Your KPI review should cover all critical quality processes including document control, human resources, software development, risk management, change management, customer feedback, vigilance, CAPA, deployment, validation, post-market surveillance, internal audits, clinical evaluation, regulatory updates, purchasing, sales, and usability engineering.

For each KPI, document the actual data collected during the review period, compare it to acceptance criteria, provide a management assessment of performance, identify any improvement measures needed, and evaluate the effectiveness of previous improvement measures. This systematic approach ensures comprehensive coverage of quality system performance.

​

3. Management Signatures and Accountability

The management review signatures section establishes clear accountability for quality decisions. You must identify the management team members who participated in the review and obtain their formal commitment to the findings and resulting actions.

Include the position, name, and signature of each management team member involved in the review. This typically includes senior executives, quality management, and other key decision-makers who have authority to allocate resources and drive organizational change. The signatures demonstrate that management has reviewed the data, understands the implications, and commits to supporting necessary improvements.

​

4. Review Timing and Follow-up

Document the date of review and establish clear timelines for implementing any improvement measures identified during the review. The management review should occur at planned intervals (typically annually) but may be conducted more frequently if significant quality issues arise.

Ensure that review findings are properly communicated throughout the organization and that responsible personnel understand their roles in implementing improvement measures. Plan for follow-up activities to verify that improvement measures are effective and achieving intended outcomes.

​

Example

Scenario: You conduct your annual management review covering the previous 12 months of QMS performance. The review shows that most KPIs are meeting acceptance criteria, but training completion rates have dropped slightly and there’s been an increase in customer feedback requiring response. Management decides to implement automated training reminders and enhance the customer feedback process to improve performance in these areas.

​

Complete Management Review Report Document

Management Review Report

ID: MRR-2024-001

​

1. Scope

This report provides the results of the management review of the quality management system (QMS) performed according to SOP Management Review. The review was conducted to assess the suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness of the QMS and to identify opportunities for improvement, if needed.

​

2. Management Review Assessment

Overall QMS Assessment:

The quality management system has performed effectively during the 2023 review period, with 22 of 24 key performance indicators meeting or exceeding acceptance criteria. The QMS demonstrates strong suitability for our medical device operations and adequate resource allocation to maintain regulatory compliance.

Two areas require management attention: training completion rates have decreased from 98% to 92%, and customer feedback response time has increased slightly. These issues do not indicate systemic failures but represent opportunities for process enhancement through improved automation and resource allocation.

The QMS continues to be effective in maintaining product quality, regulatory compliance, and customer satisfaction. No major changes to the quality system structure are required, but targeted improvements in training management and customer communication will enhance overall performance.

​

2.1 Management Signatures

Date of Review: March 20, 2024

​

3. QMS and Key Performance Indicator Review

​

Annex 1 - KPI Acceptance Criteria

The following acceptance criteria were used to evaluate the KPIs:

​

Q&A