Skip to main content

​
Summary

You must document the execution and results of all verification and validation activities through comprehensive reports that demonstrate your medical device meets design specifications and fulfills user needs. These reports provide objective evidence of regulatory compliance and device safety through systematic documentation of testing outcomes, identified deviations, and corrective actions.

​
Regulatory Context

Under 21 CFR Part 820.30 (Design Controls), you must implement:
  • Design verification reports per Section 820.30(f) demonstrating design outputs meet inputs
  • Design validation reports per Section 820.30(g) confirming devices meet user needs
  • Objective evidence documentation supporting all verification and validation conclusions
  • Design history file maintenance including all verification and validation records
  • Statistical analysis documentation per Section 820.250 for test result interpretation
Special attention required for:
  • Software validation reports per FDA guidance on software validation principles
  • Clinical validation documentation for devices requiring clinical evidence
  • Predicate device comparison documentation for 510(k) substantial equivalence
  • Cybersecurity validation results for networked devices per FDA guidance

​
Overview

Verification and validation reports represent the culminating documentation that transforms your testing activities into regulatory evidence by systematically documenting how your medical device meets both technical specifications and user needs through comprehensive testing and evaluation. These reports serve as the definitive proof that your device is safe, effective, and ready for market deployment while providing regulatory authorities with the objective evidence needed for approval decisions. Software System Test Reports document the systematic execution of software verification activities, providing detailed evidence that your software components function correctly according to specifications while maintaining safety and performance standards. These reports capture test execution details including test environment configurations, actual test results, pass/fail determinations, and resolution of any identified defects or anomalies. Software test reporting must demonstrate complete requirement coverage, document regression testing results after defect fixes, and provide traceability between software requirements and verification evidence that supports regulatory submissions and ongoing software maintenance. Additional Software Test Reports address specialized testing areas including integration testing between software components, performance testing under various load conditions, security testing for cybersecurity compliance, and compatibility testing across different platforms or operating systems. These supplementary reports ensure comprehensive coverage of software verification requirements while addressing specific technical domains that require specialized testing approaches and documentation standards. Biocompatibility Evaluation Reports document biological safety assessment for devices that contact patients directly, providing evidence that materials and device components meet biocompatibility requirements according to ISO 10993 standards. These reports synthesize testing data or existing biocompatibility evidence to demonstrate that device materials pose acceptable biological risks based on contact type, duration, and exposure pathways identified in your intended use assessment. Verification Reports for Physical Components encompass electrical safety testing, mechanical performance validation, environmental testing, and electromagnetic compatibility assessment that demonstrate hardware components meet safety and performance specifications. These reports document compliance with applicable standards such as IEC 60601 series for electrical safety, environmental testing standards, and mechanical testing protocols while providing evidence that physical device components operate safely under intended use conditions. Performance and Bench Verification Reports document systematic testing of device performance characteristics against specifications, providing objective evidence that your device meets essential performance requirements under various operating conditions. These reports capture accuracy testing, reliability assessment, durability validation, and performance boundary testing that demonstrate device capability and identify any performance limitations that require user awareness or risk control measures. Shelf-Life and Packaging Verification Reports demonstrate that your device maintains performance and safety throughout its intended storage period and operational lifetime. These reports document accelerated aging studies, packaging integrity testing, and stability assessment that support shelf-life claims and ensure device quality from manufacturing through end-of-life disposal. The integrated nature of verification and validation reporting requires careful coordination between different testing domains to ensure comprehensive coverage without gaps or redundancies. Reports must demonstrate not only individual component compliance but also system-level integration and overall device performance that meets user needs and regulatory requirements. Deviation and anomaly documentation within verification and validation reports provides transparency about testing challenges and their resolution while demonstrating systematic problem-solving approaches. Complete documentation of test failures, root cause investigations, corrective actions, and retest results shows regulatory authorities that your verification process is thorough and reliable. Traceability demonstration through verification and validation reports links testing activities back to specific requirements, design outputs, and user needs while providing clear evidence that all aspects of device performance have been systematically evaluated. This traceability supports regulatory review processes and enables efficient impact assessment when design changes or post-market issues require evaluation. Your verification and validation reports must provide regulatory confidence through clear, objective documentation that supports approval decisions and demonstrates ongoing compliance with design control requirements. Well-executed reporting reduces regulatory review timelines, prevents late-stage compliance issues, and provides the foundation for confident market authorization and commercial success by establishing credible evidence of device safety and effectiveness through systematic testing and evaluation.